From the complexities of liquid staking to the best strategies for syncing cryptocurrency to the main ledger. Learn about reporting strategies for liquidity pool tokens and how to navigate the ever-changing landscape of crypto accounting.

What are the key differences between liquid and non-liquid staking?

Jozef Vogel: At a high level, non-liquid staking means locking up your tokens to provide security to the network. You earn a yield, but your assets are frozen during this period. You can't convert them into cash or borrow against them easily. With liquid staking, on the other hand, you can deposit your assets—like ETH—and receive a token in return, which represents the staked asset. This token can be used for borrowing, yield farming, or other DeFi activities, giving you liquidity without pulling your assets from staking.

What are the reporting challenges that come with liquid staking?

Jozef Vogel: The complexities arise mainly due to the fact that the rewards aren’t always clear or easily traceable. You might earn rewards, but the Ethereum network doesn’t always make it easy to track accruals, especially when you’re dealing with liquid staking tokens. For corporations, this creates difficulties in recording income and tracking accrued rewards. The timing, income recognition, and how to calculate fair market value for staked assets make the reporting process even trickier.

How do companies treat LP tokens and NFT bonds when reporting?

Jozef Vogel: LP tokens and NFT bonds are relatively new, and treating them from a reporting perspective can be tricky. For LP tokens, you’re dealing with assets that represent liquidity in a pool, and valuing them can be difficult, especially if there’s no clear market price. NFT bonds, which are now replacing LP tokens in some cases, complicate things further since they represent more illiquid assets. A good strategy is to track the cost basis of the assets deposited and use that as a reference, but it's still a developing area that requires manual intervention in many cases.

What tax implications should companies be aware of with liquid staking?

Jozef Vogel: When you participate in liquid staking, you’re essentially exchanging one token (e.g., ETH) for another (a liquid staking token), which could trigger tax implications depending on your jurisdiction. Additionally, any rewards or yield you earn could be considered income, and tracking those rewards can be difficult. The Ethereum network doesn’t show clear, on-chain accruals, which makes it harder for companies to accurately report.

What’s your advice for integrating crypto data into traditional accounting systems?

Jozef Vogel: One key solution is using sub-ledgers that track digital asset transactions in real time. For instance, sub-ledgers can help you manage large volumes of transactions without flooding your main ledger. This is essential when you’re dealing with crypto assets like liquid staking tokens. Instead of entering each transaction into systems like QuickBooks or Xero manually, sub-ledgers allow you to batch them for easier tracking. Monthly reviews and reconciliations also help keep things manageable.

What is the value of crypto sub-ledgers in tracking complex DeFi assets like liquid staking tokens?

Jozef Vogel: Sub-ledgers are invaluable when dealing with complex DeFi assets like liquid staking tokens. They allow for detailed tracking of transactions, rewards, and cost bases without overwhelming traditional accounting systems. By keeping these transactions organized and easily accessible, companies can manage staking and other DeFi activities more effectively. Sub-ledgers also offer a layer of transparency, which is crucial when dealing with tax authorities or auditors.

‍